🔗 Share this article

In my role as a DM, I traditionally steered clear of extensive use of randomization during my tabletop roleplaying games. I tended was for story direction and session development to be guided by character actions instead of the roll of a die. However, I decided to change my approach, and I'm truly glad I did.

The Spark: Observing a Custom Mechanic

A well-known actual-play show showcases a DM who regularly requests "fate rolls" from the participants. The process entails choosing a type of die and defining consequences contingent on the roll. While it's fundamentally no distinct from using a random table, these are devised in the moment when a character's decision has no clear conclusion.

I opted to test this technique at my own table, primarily because it seemed interesting and provided a departure from my usual habits. The results were remarkable, prompting me to reconsider the perennial tension between preparation and randomization in a tabletop session.

A Memorable Story Beat

In a recent session, my players had just emerged from a massive fight. When the dust settled, a player inquired after two friendly NPCs—a sibling duo—had survived. In place of choosing an outcome, I asked for a roll. I instructed the player to roll a d20. I defined the outcomes as: on a 1-4, both were killed; on a 5-9, a single one would die; on a 10+, they made it.

The player rolled a 4. This triggered a profoundly moving moment where the party came upon the remains of their allies, forever clasped together in their final moments. The party held funeral rites, which was uniquely significant due to prior character interactions. As a parting gesture, I chose that the NPCs' bodies were miraculously transformed, showing a spell-storing object. I randomized, the bead's contained spell was exactly what the group lacked to solve another pressing story problem. One just orchestrate these kinds of perfect moments.

Sharpening On-the-Spot Skills

This event led me to ponder if randomization and thinking on your feet are truly the core of tabletop RPGs. Even if you are a meticulously planning DM, your ability to adapt may atrophy. Groups reliably take delight in ignoring the most carefully laid plans. Therefore, a good DM has to be able to pivot effectively and create details in real-time.

Employing similar mechanics is a excellent way to practice these abilities without going completely outside your usual style. The strategy is to deploy them for minor circumstances that don't fundamentally change the overarching story. To illustrate, I wouldn't use it to decide if the king's advisor is a secret enemy. However, I would consider using it to decide if the PCs reach a location moments before a key action takes place.

Strengthening Player Agency

This technique also works to keep players engaged and foster the impression that the story is responsive, shaping in reaction to their actions in real-time. It prevents the sense that they are merely actors in a DM's sole narrative, thereby enhancing the collaborative aspect of roleplaying.

This philosophy has historically been embedded in the original design. Early editions were filled with charts, which made sense for a game focused on treasure hunting. Although modern D&D often focuses on narrative and role-play, leading many DMs to feel they need exhaustive notes, that may not be the best approach.

Achieving the Healthy Equilibrium

There is absolutely nothing wrong with doing your prep. Yet, there is also no problem with relinquishing control and allowing the dice to determine certain outcomes in place of you. Control is a major part of a DM's role. We use it to manage the world, yet we can be reluctant to give some up, at times when doing so could be beneficial.

The core suggestion is this: Don't be afraid of temporarily losing the reins. Embrace a little improvisation for inconsequential details. It may find that the unexpected outcome is infinitely more memorable than anything you could have scripted on your own.