🔗 Share this article

Are your LinkedIn followers recognizing you as a industry expert? Do numerous commenters praising your insights on growing your venture? Do recruiters making contact to discuss opportunities?

Should that not be the case, the reason could be your gender.

The Test: Changing Profile Gender for Better Visibility

Dozens of female professionals participated in an organized LinkedIn experiment this week following popular discussions suggested that switching their gender to "man" enhanced their platform visibility.

Some participants modified their profiles to incorporate what they termed "masculine-oriented" language - inserting action-focused business buzzwords like "drive", "revolutionize" and "accelerate". Anecdotally, their visibility also improved.

Algorithmic Bias Concerns Brought Up

The engagement increase has led some to speculate whether a built-in sexism in the platform's system prioritizes men who use professional networking terminology.

Similar to many large social media platforms, LinkedIn employs a computerized system to decide which posts appear to which members - promoting some while suppressing others.

Platform Response

In a recent blog post, LinkedIn acknowledged the trend but stated it does not factor in "demographic information" when deciding content distribution. Rather, the company explained that "hundreds of signals" affect how posts perform.

Changing gender in your settings does not influence how your content appears in results or timelines.

Personal Experiences

A social media consultant, who changed her pronouns to "he/him" and her profile name to "a masculine version", reported extraordinary outcomes.

"The numbers I'm seeing indicate a 1,600% increase in profile views and a thirteen-fold jump in impressions," she commented.

Megan Cornish, a marketing expert, started testing after noticing her reach decline significantly.

The Process

• Initially, she modified her gender to "man"
• Then, she used AI tools to rephrase her profile using "masculine-oriented" language
• Lastly, she repurposed old posts with similar "assertive" language

The result was instantaneous: a more than fourfold rise in reach within seven days.

The Negative Aspect

Although the positive results, Cornish voiced dissatisfaction with the approach.

"Previously, my posts were more personal - brief and clever, but also friendly and human," she stated. "Currently, the masculine version was forceful and self-assured - like a Caucasian man being overly confident."

She discontinued the test after one week, stating "Each day I persisted, and outcomes got better, I became angrier."

Mixed Results

Not all participants encountered positive results. Cass Cooper who modified both her gender to "man" and her race to "white" described a decrease in reach and engagement.

"We understand there's systemic preference, but it's very challenging to comprehend how it functions in particular situations or why," she commented.

Wider Consequences

These tests coincide with continuing discussions about LinkedIn's distinctive role as both a business platform and social space.

Platform modifications in the past few months have apparently resulted in female creators experiencing markedly lower visibility, leading to informal experiments where identical content by men and women received dramatically unequal reach.

Technical Explanation

Per LinkedIn, the network uses AI systems to classify and spread posts based on various elements, including what's shared and the member's career profile.

The company states it frequently assesses its algorithms, including "checks for inequalities based on gender."

A spokesperson proposed that recent declines in some users' reach might originate from higher volume due to more content on the platform.

Changing Landscape

As one participant noted, "bro-coding" appears to be increasing on the platform.

"Users typically consider LinkedIn as more professional and polished," she commented. "That's changing. It's turning into increasingly aggressive and unpredictable."